White spot lesions during orthodontic clear aligner therapy: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: White spot lesions (WSL) are an unsightly and a rather frequent drawback of orthodontic treatment. The complex design of fixed orthodontic appliances (FAs) makes it difficult to perform proper oral hygiene, which amounts to white spot lesions being three times more prevalent in patients wearing orthodontic appliances. As clear thermoplastic aligners (CAs) are removable appliances, it has been speculated that they allow better oral hygiene maintenance and thus less incidence of WSLs. OBJECTIVES: This evidence-based scoping review aims to identify the scope and nature of the evidence on white spot lesions during orthodontic clear aligner therapy. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: Strategic and thorough search of the literature for randomized Controlled Trials, Case-Control, Cohort studies, Case reports, full research articles, and review papers on humans published in English in five major databases was undertaken till July 2021 using free text and Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms, followed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to identify five studies for data extraction. RESULTS: Evidence was summarized for study characteristics, diagnostic methods for the detection of white spot lesions, and incidence of white spot lesions during clear aligner therapy. The literature supports that orthodontic treatment with CAs was associated with a low incidence of WSLs when compared with fixed mechanotherapy, with a major role of patient education, motivation, and compliance in maintaining oral hygiene. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The general perception is that clear aligners are more hygienic and show no incidence of white spot lesions. However, our scoping review supports that WSLs can occur with this form of orthodontic treatment also. WSLs in clear aligners could be attributed to the practice of having composite attachments that cover a significant portion of the tooth surface. Thus, regardless of the type of appliance used, a periodic reinforcement by the orthodontist to maintain oral hygiene is necessary for patient motivation, allowing for better oral hygiene practice, and as a result, leads to prevention of WSLs.

Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and expression of biomarkers: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Micro-osteoperforation is a minimally invasive technique that has been used to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement and reduce treatment duration. However, literature presents conflicting reports about this technique. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of canine retraction and expression of biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial with split-mouth study design. Thirty adult subjects with age above 18 years (20.32 ± 1.96) who required fixed orthodontic treatment and extraction of maxillary first premolars were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the experimental or control group. Randomization was performed by block randomization method, with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The experimental group received three micro-ostoperforations (MOPs) distal to maxillary canine, using the Lance pilot drill. The retraction of maxillary canine was performed with NiTi coil-spring (150g) in both experimental and control groups. The primary outcome was the evaluation of canine retraction rate, measured on study models from the baseline to 16 weeks of canine retraction. Secondary outcomes were the estimation of alkaline and acid phosphates activity in GCF at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of canine retraction only after the first 4 weeks. Subsequently there was no statistically significant difference from the eighth to the sixteenth weeks between MOPs and control group. There was a statistically significant difference in alkaline and acid phosphates activity in GCF between MOPs and control groups during the initial 4 weeks of canine retraction. CONCLUSION: Micro-ostoperforation increased the rate of tooth movement only for the first 4 weeks; thereafter, no effect was observed on the rate of canine retraction during 8, 12 and 16 weeks. A marked increase in biomarker activity in the first month was observed.

Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and expression of biomarkers: a randomized controlled clinical trial

ABSTRACT Introduction: Micro-osteoperforation is a minimally invasive technique that has been used to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement and reduce treatment duration. However, literature presents conflicting reports about this technique. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of canine retraction and expression of biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial with split-mouth study design. Thirty adult subjects with age above 18 years (20.32 ± 1.96) who required fixed orthodontic treatment and extraction of maxillary first premolars were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the experimental or control group. Randomization was performed by block randomization method, with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The experimental group received three micro-ostoperforations (MOPs) distal to maxillary canine, using the Lance pilot drill. The retraction of maxillary canine was performed with NiTi coil-spring (150g) in both experimental and control groups. The primary outcome was the evaluation of canine retraction rate, measured on study models from the baseline to 16 weeks of canine retraction. Secondary outcomes were the estimation of alkaline and acid phosphates activity in GCF at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of canine retraction only after the first 4 weeks. Subsequently there was no statistically significant difference from the eighth to the sixteenth weeks between MOPs and control group. There was a statistically significant difference in alkaline and acid phosphates activity in GCF between MOPs and control groups during the initial 4 weeks of canine retraction. Conclusion: Micro-ostoperforation increased the rate of tooth movement only for the first 4 weeks; thereafter, no effect was observed on the rate of canine retraction during 8, 12 and 16 weeks. A marked increase in biomarker activity in the first month was observed.

RESUMO Introdução: As micro-osteoperfurações (MOPs) são uma técnica minimamente invasiva que tem sido utilizada para acelerar a movimentação dentária ortodôntica e reduzir o tempo de tratamento. No entanto, existem relatos conflitantes sobre o uso dessa técnica. Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia das MOPs em acelerar a taxa do movimento de retração de caninos e na expressão de biomarcadores no fluido crevicular gengival (FCG). Métodos: Esse foi um ensaio clínico randomizado com desenho de estudo do tipo boca dividida. Trinta indivíduos adultos com idade acima de 18 anos (20,32 ± 1,96 anos) que necessitavam de tratamento ortodôntico fixo e extração de primeiros pré-molares superiores foram incluídos e aleatoriamente alocados para o grupo experimental ou grupo controle. A randomização foi realizada pelo método de randomização em bloco, com proporção de alocação de 1:1. O grupo experimental recebeu três MOPs distais ao canino superior, utilizando uma broca piloto em formato de lança. A retração do canino superior foi realizada com mola helicoidal de NiTi (150g) nos dois grupos, experimental e controle. O desfecho primário foi a avaliação da taxa de retração dos caninos, medida em modelos de estudo do início da retração até 16 semanas depois. O desfecho secundário foi a estimativa da atividade da fosfatase alcalina e ácida no FCG após 0, 1, 2, 3 e 4 semanas. Resultados: Houve uma diferença estatisticamente significativa na taxa de retração dos caninos somente após as quatro primeiras semanas. Após isso, não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos experimental e controle entre a oitava e a décima sexta semanas. Houve uma diferença estatisticamente significativa na atividade da fosfatase alcaline e ácida no FCG entre os grupos experimental e controle durante as quatro primeiras semanas de retração dos caninos. Conclusão: As micro-osteoperfurações aumentaram a taxa de movimentação dentária apenas nas primeiras quatro semanas; depois disso, nenhum efeito foi observado na taxa de retração dos caninos após 8, 12 e 16 semanas. Houve aumento considerável na atividade do biomarcador no primeiro mês.

Effect of micro-osteoperforations on rate of space closure by mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Micro-osteoperforations is one of the non-invasive surgical techniques used in attempt to accelerate OTM. Conflicting reports on its effectiveness has been reported in the literature. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this trial were to investigate the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of space closure and on molar anchorage loss during mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction. TRIAL DESIGN: A single center, parallel arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted. METHOD: Sixty, male and female subjects (age range 16-25 years) having Class I bimaxillary protrusion or Class II div 1 malocclusion, who required fixed mechanotherapy with either upper 1st premolar or all four 1st premolar extractions were allocated into two groups using 1:1 allocation ratio. The allocation was done by block randomization method with a block size of 6. In the experimental group, 5 MOPs per side were performed only once just before the en-masse anterior retraction. Mini-screws were placed in order to obtain maximum anchorage. Impressions were taken every month till 4 months and rate of space closure was measured on 3D study models. RESULTS: Data of 27 subjects in control (attrition â€‹= â€‹3) and 28 subjects in experimental group (attrition â€‹= â€‹2) were analyzed at the end of this trial. There was a statistically significant increase in the rate of en-masse retraction for the 1st month(p â€‹= â€‹0.001,95%CI, 0.17, 0.37 â€‹mm) but there was no statistically significant difference for the subsequent 2nd (p â€‹= â€‹0.450,95%CI,0.13,0.43 â€‹mm), 3rd(p â€‹= â€‹0.204,95%CI,0.23,0.47 â€‹mm) and 4th month (p â€‹= â€‹0.680,95%CI,0.21,0.41 â€‹mm) between experimental and control groups. There was also no difference (p â€‹> â€‹0.05) in molar anchorage loss between both groups at all time intervals. CONCLUSION: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) did not accelerate the rate of anterior en-masse retraction over a period of 4 months; however, it temporarily increases the rate of retraction only for first month and no affect on molar anchorage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at www.ctri.nic.in with CTRI No- CTRI/2019/03/018140).